I've used the word "tweens" before, both when speaking and in articles. I have meant it to be those aged 9-12 or right around there. I read something that caught my eye the other day, saying that the word "tween" is just a word put together by advertisers to create an age and culture to market to, and that there really isn't a "tween" stage. I didn't give it a whole lot of thought until this week when two separate incidents made it clear what the article was referring to.
On Tuesday I went for my daily Starbucks fix. I think that a location that is not the closest to my house makes a better peppermint mocha, so sometimes I will drive a few extra minutes for what I consider to be a better tasting drink. On Tuesday I made such a drive only to find the place packed with "tweens". The Starbucks is close to the local middle school and on this particular morning, they had a late start. I was flabbergasted to see so many kids this age drinking coffee! Aren't we supposed to keep kids away from caffeine? And it was obvious this wasn't their first visit, they knew the lingo and one young man sported a gold Starbucks card (for the serious customers). I must say, I was shocked.
Later that same day, Ally had dance class. It was dress rehearsal week, so she was dressed in full recital regalia. Another class that was rehearsing was the "tween" age. All of these girls had not yet developed, but each and everyone sported a bra. How do I know? Because of the way their costumes were designed, all bra straps were exposed. I know that is somewhat the "style" (and believe me, I am far from stylish), but really, girls who don't need bras wearing them and letting them show?
I don't yet have children in the "tween" age range, but when I do, you'll know which ones are mine. They won't be drinking coffee or exposing their bra straps. What do you think? Do you think I’m too old fashion or being a smart parent?
Posted by Margaret Sarver